| Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics |
96 / 721 | |
| Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Plant Science |
73 / 516 | |
| Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Ecology |
72 / 461 |
| APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
|---|---|---|
| Yes: Check details ( CHF2700; ) | Yes: Check details | No |
| Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
| Category: PLANT SCIENCES | SCIE | Q1 | 46/265 |
|
| Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
| Category: PLANT SCIENCES | SCIE | Q1 | 43/265 |
|
| Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
|---|---|---|
| Nature Ecology & Evolution | 0 | 22.20 |
| Current Forestry Reports | 0 | 15.90 |
| Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology | 0 | 15.40 |
| Plant Diversity | 0 | 8.30 |
| NeoBiota | 11 | 8.10 |
| Global Ecology and Conservation | 20 | 8.10 |
| Ecosystems and People | 0 | 7.80 |
| Journal of Systematics and Evolution | 36 | 8.20 |
| Movement Ecology | 21 | 6.60 |
| WEB ECOLOGY | 15 | 4.60 |
Select your rating and start your review of Plants-Basel
2025-03-25
2025.02.22 submit
2025.02.27 under review
2025.03.07 major review
2025.03.17 resubmit
2025.03.18 minor review
2025.03.20 resubmit
2025.03.21 pending editor decision
2025.03.22 accept
2025-03-14
The research level is poor, which is not embarrassing, but the low quality is really a waste of so many years of study.
2025-03-14
Oh my, someone is really losing their temper, even using foul language, shocking.
2025-03-10
Are you feeling superior even after eating shit?
2025-03-04
Did you graduate with a Ph.D.?
2024-12-16
Submitted on October 24th
Major revision on November 23rd (4 reviewers, received comments from 3 reviewers initially, one external expert showed interest and provided comments two days after receiving the major revision notification); one reviewer raised many professional questions, some even self-answered, another reviewer said the analysis method was unreasonable and requested new figures; language was also criticized as inadequate and needed polishing, another reviewer pointed out several minor professional issues, one suggested to simplify the discussion section, with no other issues. This was my first submission to an MDPI journal, I am not sure if all submissions have two or more external experts, or if I just happened to encounter several; overall, the external experts were quite professional, at least in my field, and raised many strong professional questions.
Returned on December 6th
Minor revision on December 12th, just a few very minor issues
Returned on December 13th
Accepted on December 14th
Overall, the process was very fast, the external reviewers were experts with strong relevance, and some of their comments were very insightful.
On a side note, before graduation, some PhD students may look down on MDPI, but after graduation, it's actually quite good.
2024-11-22
Have you submitted it for review?
2024-11-22
Please submit on November 21st.
2024-11-19
The template was rejected, possibly still not meeting the journal's intentions.
2024-11-14
11-08 Pending review
11-08 待审核
