ACTA MECHANICA SOLIDA SINICA
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Computational Mechanics |
28 / 89 | |
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering |
262 / 672 | |
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials |
174 / 398 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | SCIE | Q3 | 294/439 |
|
Category: MECHANICS | SCIE | Q3 | 91/170 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | SCIE | Q3 | 265/439 |
|
Category: MECHANICS | SCIE | Q3 | 109/170 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
Nature Nanotechnology | 286 | 59.70 |
NATURE MATERIALS | 403 | 62.20 |
PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE | 144 | 59.60 |
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS | 129 | 60.50 |
ADVANCED MATERIALS | 447 | 43.00 |
Materials Today | 138 | 36.30 |
ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS | 269 | 29.50 |
INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS | 95 | 28.50 |
ACS Nano | 310 | 26.00 |
Nano Today | 119 | 21.50 |
Select your rating and start your review of ACTA MECHANICA SOLIDA SINICA
2025-04-11
2024-07-25
I have been in this state for half a month.
2024-06-20
The submission was made on June 10th, and it has been Editor Assigned ever since.
2023-07-24
Why are there so few people submitting to this journal?
2023-07-14
2.9 Submission
5.4 First round of review comments returned (major revisions)
5.20 Revised
6.14 Second round of review comments returned (minor revisions)
6.15 Revised
6.25 Third round of review comments returned (minor revisions)
6.26 Revised
6.30 Fourth round of review comments returned (minor revisions - formatting issues)
7.3 Revised
7.4 Accepted
2022-11-07
The editor is very responsible and accepted my submission after correcting the grammar errors. This journal is expected to be upgraded to a higher classification, and many experts in the field publish their articles in it.
2022-07-31
This journal editor is very responsible, and the processing efficiency is very high.
2017-10-29
very junk journal, many articles inside are a lot of mistakes, includingThe theory is completely wrong, can't the editor edit it?This kind of journal is really shameful.
2016-10-04
1.21 contribution4.15 Return of the first review draft4.23 repaired back8.12 Return of the second review draft8.14 second repair8.29 receivingThe editor is very good, personally modify
2016-10-04
1.21Submission4.15 Return of the first review draft4.23 repaired back8.12 Return of the second review draft8.14 second repair8.29 receivingEditor-in-chief is very good, personally modify