Research Creative   My Account   Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Scientific Journal Selector



CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION


👁  176404 Views

 91 Reviews  

 Open Access      SCIE      Official Website     Submission Website
Return to Search
 

*Average Peer Review
About 3.0 month(s)
*Competitiveness
Difficult
CiteScore
23.5

CiteScore Rank
Subject Area Rank Percentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
6 / 404
98%
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
7 / 402
98%



Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.

ISSN
1040-8398
E-ISSN
1549-7852
Year Publication Started
1980

Self-citation (2024-2025)
2.30%
Annual Article Volume
243
Gold OA Percentage
11.09%


Open Access Info
APC APC Waiver Other Charges
N/A N/A N/A

Journal Aim & Scope
The objective of Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition is to present critical viewpoints of current technology, food science, and human nutrition. Also, the application of scientific discoveries and the acquisition of knowledge, as they relate to nutrition, functional foods, food safety, and food science and technology are thoroughly addressed in this comprehensive and authoritative information source.

Reviews include issues of national concern, especially to food scientists, nutritionists, and health professionals, including:

Diet and disease
Antioxidants
A llergenicity and food coloring
Microbiological concerns
Flavor chemistry
The role of nutrients and their bioavailability
Pesticides
Toxic chemicals and regulation
Reviews also cover risk assessment, food safety, food processing, government regulation and policy, nutrition, fortification, new food products/ingredients and technologies, food and behavior, effects of processing on nutrition, food labeling, functional/bioactive foods, and diet and health.


Web of Science Quartiles
WOS Quartile: Q1

Quartiles By JIFCollectionQuartileRankPercentage
Category: FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYSCIEQ110/181
94.8%
Category: NUTRITION & DIETETICSSCIEQ16/112
95.1%
Quartiles By JCICollectionQuartileRankPercentage
Category: FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYSCIEQ144/181
75.97%
Category: NUTRITION & DIETETICSSCIEQ123/112
79.91%
*Crowdsourced data
  • Journals In The Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trends
  • Self Citation Trends
  • Annual Article Volume Trends
  • Journal Title h-index CiteScore
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY16234.20
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY8225.50
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS13221.70
    Food Chemistry22118.30
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL13412.80
    Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies9612.50
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY11513.60
    FOOD CONTROL10314.10
    MEAT SCIENCE14213.70
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL6215.80
  • CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
    Predict CiteScore Trend:
    Steady Increase No Change Gradual Decline  Refresh
 
    👁  176404 Views
      91 Reviews        
 
 
 

Select your rating and start your review of CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION

 

    Jack Lee
    Status: Accepted

    2025-05-30

    There is a high probability of being rejected.




    无与
    Status: N/A

    2025-05-14

    After I applied, I got a direct rejection letter within 3 days. Does this mean I was rejected?




    无与
    Status: N/A

    2025-05-14

    I directly DP after WE, does it mean I was rejected?




    Jack Lee
    Status: Accepted

    2025-03-05

    After submitting the manuscript, it had been four or five months with the editor. I wrote a follow-up letter urging them to expedite the review process, and soon after, it was sent for review. After revisions, the manuscript was accepted for publication.




    风的速度
    Status: Accepted

    2025-03-02

    Received, happy, the editing process was still very fast. However, it took a relatively long time with the reviewer during the second review. After the reviewer completed the review, it was recorded in less than a week. Overall, it is still acceptable. Thanks to the editor and the reviewer. Excellent!




    请请请请请
    Status: N/A

    2025-02-11

    I submitted my paper before, and one month after the initial review, it was still pending decision. This status remained for over two months before finally receiving major revisions. It is possible that one reviewer completed their review while others did not.




    litingting
    Status: N/A

    2025-02-10

    I am also pending for a long time, how about you?




    7754
    Status: N/A

    2025-01-15

    Has the status changed now?




    snow1266
    Status: N/A

    2025-01-07

    How long does the Decision Pending status typically last? It's been almost a week and the status hasn't changed yet.




    Sci收收收
    Status: N/A

    2025-01-03

    What's going on now? It won't be reviewed for a few days?







© 2010-2025  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Servic