NORDIC PULP & PAPER RESEARCH JOURNAL
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Forestry |
67 / 174 | |
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: General Materials Science |
293 / 463 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD | SCIE | Q3 | 14/23 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD | SCIE | Q3 | 13/23 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
WOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 62 | 5.90 |
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products | 50 | 5.40 |
HOLZFORSCHUNG | 67 | 4.60 |
JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE | 51 | 5.40 |
JOURNAL OF WOOD CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 39 | 3.70 |
BioResources | 59 | 2.90 |
CELLULOSE CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 27 | 2.30 |
Maderas-Ciencia y Tecnologia | 20 | 2.60 |
FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL | 47 | 2.10 |
WOOD RESEARCH | 14 | 2.40 |
Select your rating and start your review of NORDIC PULP & PAPER RESEARCH JOURNAL
2025-03-26
Submitted on November 26, 2024.
Received reviewer comments on January 2, 2025, major revision required.
Submitted revised manuscript on March 11, 2025.
Received minor revision comments on March 18, 2016.
Submitted second revised manuscript on March 21, 2016.
Received acceptance confirmation on March 24, 2016.
2024-05-24
The speed of the review process is unbelievably slow. It took one and a half months for the first review, and after the major revision was submitted, it took two months for a response. There were three rounds of revisions, each time with a different reviewer. There were even instances where the previous reviewer requested additions that the subsequent reviewer requested to be deleted. Both the journal and the editing agency said there were no issues with the manuscript, but each new reviewer would always point out one or two irrelevant issues, such as changing American English to British English. After 8 months of waiting, the manuscript was finally rejected, citing lack of innovation as the reason for rejection
2021-12-09
Hello! May I ask what is the email address for submitting contributions? The email address provided by letpub is incorrect.
2021-05-11
Brother, what does it mean when the email editor displays "pollution guard"?
2020-08-16
Chief Editor of the journal is Dr. Tom Lindstrom (onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com). Submission should be made through the system. During the epidemic, the review process was relatively slow. Fortunately, it has been accepted.
2016-02-17
email contributed, the review speed is fast.2016.1.7 contribution, the editor received on the same day received an email confirmation confirmation, and told the review will be completed within 8 weeks;2016.1.18 Received review comments;2016.1.29 submitted revised manuscript;2016.2.12 received further comments;2016.2.16 Submitted the second revised maunscrpit2016.2.17 Received acceptance confirmation.
2013-04-18
The name of the female editor can't be displayed normally. I changed it. Elisabet Brannvall, the one behind Br has two points.If you submit a manuscript, you can bring those two points when you send the e-mail. I believe she will be very happy.
2013-04-18
This journal's influence in Europe is still very prominent (limited to pulp and paper), but it is rare to see Asian manuscripts published, which may be a problem.
2011-02-19
can't be submitted online, only in the form of E-mail. Generally, you don't need to recommend reviewers yourself. The editor is a pulp and paper professional.The review speed is relatively fast (generally, the review comments are returned within 6 weeks), my contribution is issued on January 26, and the reviewer's opinion is returned on February 15th.The female editor is very serious, even if the comments rejected are very pertinent, not a standard rejection letter in the form of a set of words.2011.02.19评论