Increasingly authors require illustrations for digital manuscript submissions and conference presentations or lectures. Examples of supporting illustrations include device sketches, schematics for clinical trials and molecular processes, and even artist renderings of geographic locations or features. These illustrations can be powerful tools for communicating exceedingly difficult scientific concepts. They can provide a tremendous advantage during the peer review process when submitted as part of a competitive manuscript. Utilize our team of exceptional illustrators and graphic designers to produce effective imagery for your work. LetPub will present you with an intuitive and accurate illustration according to your preferences. You can choose your style, and our talented team can accommodate high-end 3D designs according to your specifications.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: After confirmation of the basic design direction, we will provide any necessary revisions until you are satisfied with the final design of your animation.
In-scope client-requested revisions are accommodated as part of the purchase price for the service. In-scope revisions constitute those revisions necessary to refine the final deliverable to meet the original project brief, pending client approval. All revisions requested after delivery of the completed project will be subject to an additional fee at the discretion of LetPub. Out-of-scope revisions—including, but not limited to, requests for novel designs beyond the original brief, requests for design elements beyond the contracted service, and requests to revise elements previously approved by the client—will be subject to an additional fee at the discretion of LetPub.
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.