LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Urban Studies |
2 / 288 | |
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Nature and Landscape Conservation |
3 / 222 | |
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law |
10 / 406 | |
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Ecology |
12 / 481 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: ECOLOGY | SCIE | Q1 | 6/200 |
|
Category: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | SSCI | Q1 | 10/191 |
|
Category: GEOGRAPHY | SSCI | Q1 | 2/173 |
|
Category: GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL | SCIE | Q1 | 2/67 |
|
Category: REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING | SSCI | Q1 | 2/55 |
|
Category: URBAN STUDIES | SSCI | Q1 | 1/76 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: ECOLOGY | SCIE | Q1 | 4/200 |
|
Category: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | SSCI | Q1 | 6/191 |
|
Category: GEOGRAPHY | SSCI | Q1 | 1/173 |
|
Category: GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL | SCIE | Q1 | 2/67 |
|
Category: REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING | SSCI | Q1 | 2/55 |
|
Category: URBAN STUDIES | SSCI | Q1 | 1/77 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
ISME Journal | 140 | 21.80 |
ECOLOGY LETTERS | 234 | 13.20 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY | 35 | 13.30 |
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS | 142 | 14.50 |
Ecological Informatics | 42 | 11.40 |
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 127 | 12.50 |
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY | 160 | 11.40 |
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY | 137 | 9.00 |
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY | 159 | 9.30 |
ECOGRAPHY | 109 | 10.80 |
Select your rating and start your review of LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
2024-07-31
Don't waste what has been submitted.
2024-07-15
May I ask what stage you are currently in, and how long it typically takes for a decision to be under review after the initial stage?
2024-06-13
Do not let down what has been invested
2024-06-12
2024-6-1 submitted to journal
2024-6-4 with editor
2024-6-11 Reject
Does not fit journal scope
2024-03-08
I had three reviewers:
The first one was relatively positive, very careful in reviewing, even noticed the typos, basically asked for minor revisions and gave a few suggestions;
The second one was neutral, basically asked for major revisions and gave a few comments;
The third one nitpicked on various aspects, criticized the title, lack of innovation, and provided various reasons, directly recommending rejection.
Finally rejected. I emailed the editor explaining the situation, also told him that I will revise according to the reviewers' comments, and explained the revision plan, hoping for a chance to resubmit. However, the editor replied that since I did not have the support of all the reviewers, they could not change the decision to reject.
In this case, can I still resubmit?
2023-12-28
There is a high chance of getting rehired after resubmission. In our case, after major revisions were made and resubmitted, we were accepted after only minor revisions, with the same reviewer as before
2023-07-02
The translation of the text into English is:
In a similar situation as mine, I withdrew and resubmitted. After resubmission, it still went through three reviewers and took over six months. However, it came back as a major revision and was accepted directly after the changes were made. From the first submission to the final acceptance, it took nearly two years.
2023-04-17
Special thanks to Weiqi Zhou for editing, very efficient and responsible!
2023-04-17
08.23 submit
09.03 with editor
09.10 under review
10.27 major revision
12.13 with editor
12.17 under review
02.02 under review, updated time (with editor rejection)
04.17 Accepted
2023-02-01
I have experienced being rejected and resubmitting, but after making revisions for a month and sending it back, the editor rejected it again without providing specific reasons.