ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Aquatic Science |
29 / 247 | |
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Oceanography |
19 / 145 | |
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics |
95 / 721 | |
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences Subcategory: Ecology |
70 / 461 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: FISHERIES | SCIE | Q1 | 11/62 |
|
Category: MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY | SCIE | Q1 | 11/119 |
|
Category: OCEANOGRAPHY | SCIE | Q1 | 13/65 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: FISHERIES | SCIE | Q1 | 10/62 |
|
Category: MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY | SCIE | Q1 | 10/119 |
|
Category: OCEANOGRAPHY | SCIE | Q1 | 8/65 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT | 70 | 8.50 |
Ocean Science | 48 | 5.90 |
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 179 | 8.80 |
PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY | 120 | 7.20 |
OCEANOGRAPHY | 76 | 6.10 |
OCEAN MODELLING | 72 | 5.50 |
MARINE CHEMISTRY | 117 | 6.00 |
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY | 128 | 5.80 |
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE | 118 | 5.60 |
OCEANOLOGIA | 37 | 5.30 |
Select your rating and start your review of ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
2024-11-28
May I ask where to check the progress of the review?
2024-02-07
Submission in June, revised feedback in July, followed by three rounds of minor edits, and acceptance in November. The feedback was constructive and the editor's meticulous work was greatly appreciated. It's just too expensive
2021-12-29
The review process was fast, despite being rejected, but I appreciate the constructive feedback.
2021-12-16
This journal is a top journal in the field of fisheries and also in the field of marine environment. The proportion of Chinese authors publishing papers is about 2.3%, which is the reason why the impact factor has always remained at 3+. Compared to other journals with higher impact factors, the proportion of Chinese submissions is usually over 60%. So, even though the impact factor is not high, it is definitely not a low-quality journal. Many people may think that the cost-effectiveness is not high when looking at the impact factor. However, the opinions of the three reviewers, except for the first reviewer who gave more general comments, are very serious and the suggested modifications are valuable and not difficult to make. It is a good journal and not difficult to publish in. I recommend submitting.
2015-11-27
3 reviewer, the speed is very fast, the opinion is pertinent, the difficulty is not big.